Loading...
Since raltegravir was approved, clinicians (and indeed many patients) have wondered whether it might be a safe replacement for enfuvirtide in fully suppressive regimens. A new case series, conducted with support from the maker of raltegravir, provides early reassuring data about this strategy.
Thirty-five patients in British Columbia with undetectable viral loads (<50 copies/mL) accepted the option of switching the enfuvirtide in their regimens to raltegravir. The median time on enfuvirtide before the switch was 25 months, and the median time with undetectable viral loads was 24 months. The switch was done in a single day without overlapping doses.
As of January 2008, all 35 patients remained on raltegravir (median duration, 7 months; range, 1–13 months). All but one maintained consistently undetectable viral loads. That patient had a single measurement of 60 copies/mL after 5 months of raltegravir; since then, according to personal communication with the authors, his viral load has remained below 50 copies/mL without a change in regimen. Notably, he had similar episodes of intermittent low-level viremia while taking enfuvirtide. No patient experienced adverse effects that could be linked unequivocally to raltegravir.
Harris M et al. Outcomes of multidrug-resistant patients switched from enfuvirtide to raltegravir within a virologically suppressive regimen. AIDS 2008 Jun 19; 22:1224.
Comment
Patients on enfuvirtide frequently grow weary of the twice-daily injections, the sometimes-painful injection-site reactions, and the sheer hassle of having to mix the medication daily. In addition, enfuvirtide remains by far the most costly antiretroviral agent. As a result, any cumulative experience with a successful substitution strategy is certainly welcome. A formal prospective study evaluating the raltegravir-for-enfuvirtide switch is currently ongoing. In the meantime, many clinicians have already moved toward this change for their patients, despite the absence of much published data.