The DART study showed similar outcomes between patients on antiretroviral therapy who received laboratory tests only as clinically indicated and those who underwent routine monitoring.
With drastic reductions in the price of antiretroviral drugs, laboratory tests have become one of the largest contributors to the cost of providing antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-constrained settings. This expense, coupled with the lack of laboratory facilities, has resulted in patients on ART being managed without routine laboratory monitoring.
To evaluate the consequences of this approach, investigators conducted an open, noninferiority trial (DART) among 3321 symptomatic HIV-infected adults initiating ART in Uganda and Zimbabwe (median CD4 count, 65 cells/mm3). Patients were randomized to clinical monitoring with or without additional routine toxicity and CD4-cell–count monitoring.
Five-year survival was similar between the group…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUNAIDS; WHO; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Population Council
Grant/Research SupportNIH; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Tides Foundation/MAC AIDS Fund; USAID; South African National Research Foundation; European Union; South African Medical Research Council
Editorial BoardsNew England Journal of Medicine; AIDS Reviews; AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses; mBio; Indian Journal of Medical Research; JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUNAIDS; WHO; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Population Council
Grant/Research SupportNIH; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Tides Foundation/MAC AIDS Fund; USAID; South African National Research Foundation; European Union; South African Medical Research Council
Editorial BoardsNew England Journal of Medicine; AIDS Reviews; AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses; mBio; Indian Journal of Medical Research; JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes