In a high-volume urban ED, this strategy modestly increased the number of patients with new HIV diagnoses, but most such patients already had advanced disease.
In 2006, the CDC recommended that routine, opt-out HIV testing be conducted in all healthcare settings, including emergency departments (EDs). However, little research has been done to evaluate the results of this recommendation. Researchers now compare the yield of routine, opt-out testing with that of physician-directed, targeted testing in a high-volume ED in Denver.
For 2 years, the ED alternated between these two rapid-testing approaches in sequential 4-month blocks. (Notably, during the opt-out periods, patients who opted out could still undergo physician-directed testing.) Each approach was completely integrated into the ED operations on a 24-hour basis, and no additional personnel were involved.
During the opt-out periods, 76% of more…
Reviewing Authors
DisclosuresGrant/Research SupportNIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse
Editorial BoardsJAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes; Vaccines
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesInternational Antiviral Society–USA (Board of Directors); Infectious Diseases Society of America (Past President)
DisclosuresGrant/Research SupportNIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse
Editorial BoardsJAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes; Vaccines
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesInternational Antiviral Society–USA (Board of Directors); Infectious Diseases Society of America (Past President)