Insertion times were comparable with the two supraglottic airway devices, but the LMA Supreme had better operating characteristics.
To compare the insertion success rates and ventilation profiles of the LMA Supreme and the i-gel supraglottic airway devices, researchers in Italy randomized 80 women undergoing breast surgery to airway management with one of the two devices. The 80 operators included medical students, surgeons, nurses, and social workers, all of whom received a brief didactic session and two practice insertions on simulator manikins with each device. Patient exclusion criteria were risk for aspiration (nonfasted, pregnant, body-mass index >35 kg/m2, or history of reflux), potential difficult airway (mouth opening <2 cm, Mallampati class 4, limited neck extension, previous difficult intubation), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status >3, or p…
Reviewing Authors
DisclosuresSpeaker’s bureauAirway Management Education Center
DisclosuresSpeaker’s bureauAirway Management Education Center
DisclosuresSpeaker's bureauAirway Management Education Center, LLC
EquityAirway Management Education Center, LLC
Grant / Research supportAgency for Health Care Research and Quality
Editorial boardsManual of Emergency Airway Management; Rosen's Emergency Medicine; UpToDate; Scientific American Medicine
Leadership positions in professional societiesAssociation of Academic Chairs in Emergency Medicine (President)
DisclosuresSpeaker's bureauAirway Management Education Center, LLC
EquityAirway Management Education Center, LLC
Grant / Research supportAgency for Health Care Research and Quality
Editorial boardsManual of Emergency Airway Management; Rosen's Emergency Medicine; UpToDate; Scientific American Medicine
Leadership positions in professional societiesAssociation of Academic Chairs in Emergency Medicine (President)