Loading...
In the AFFIRM trial, minimally symptomatic elders with atrial fibrillation (AF) and high stroke risk experienced no more survival benefit with rhythm control (cardioversion plus antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm [SR]) than with rate control (control of ventricular response to persistent AF with heart-rate goals); Journal Watch Cardiology Jan 10 2003. Because AF and SR were common in both groups during follow-up, SR could have been an important factor in survival.
Now, the AFFIRM investigators have conducted an on-treatment (rather than an intention-to-treat) analysis of their data, accounting for variables (including SR) that changed over time. Of 4060 AFFIRM subjects, 2796 had echocardiographic data available for on-treatment an…