A meta-analysis of individual patient data from six trials uncovers no clear benefit.
Many consider aspirin to be a miracle drug, but its use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events remains controversial. To synthesize the existing evidence, these investigators pooled patient-level data from major prevention trials comparing aspirin with no aspirin (control).
Six primary-prevention trials involving 95,000 subjects were included in the analysis. During 330,000 person-years, 1671 vascular events occurred in the aspirin group and 1883 in the control group (0.51% and 0.57% per year, respectively; relative risk, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–0.94). Aspirin was associated with an 18% proportional reduction in coronary events, with an absolute reduction of 0.06% per year. Stroke incidence was not significantly reduced …
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association