Compared with placebo, a much-maligned alternative treatment demonstrates a modest benefit, prompting an editorialist to cry foul.
Chelation therapy for coronary artery disease consists of a series of infusions containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), which facilitates urinary excretion of divalent and trivalent cations. Although the evidence supporting this therapy is weak, and it is far out of the cardiology mainstream, a national survey indicated that in 2007 more than 100,000 adults received chelation therapy. Therefore, the NIH sponsored the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy to determine if a chelation regimen reduces cardiovascular events. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) were assigned to receive an infusion of EDTA, ascorbate, B vitamins, electrolytes, procaine, and heparin (n=839) or a …
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association