A tailored management approach — involving measurements of serum infliximab and human antichimeric antibodies — showed promise.
Infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that acts against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), is effective for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; JW Gastroenterol Jan 3 2006 and JW Gastroenterol Jun 12 2002). However, clinical response to infliximab often declines. Such diminishing response is typically addressed empirically by increasing the infliximab dose, shortening the interval between dose administrations (sometimes in addition to increasing the dose), switching to another anti-TNF agent, or switching to a different class of immune modulators. Would measuring blood concentrations of infliximab and human antichimeric antibodies (HACAs) guide patient management more effectively?
To find out, investigators retrospectively analyzed data from 155 patients whose serum levels of infliximab and HACA had been measured primarily because of loss of response to infliximab (49% of patients) or partial response after treatment initiation (22%). Therapeutic levels of infliximab (defined as ≥12 µg/mL 4 weeks after infusion or >1.4 µg/mL at dosing trough) were identified in 51 patients (33%).
A total of 69 patients had subtherapeutic infliximab concentrations. In this group, among 29 whose infliximab doses were increased, 25 (86%) achieved a complete or partial response; among 6 patients who were switched to a different anti-TNF agent, 2 (33%) achieved a clinical response. A total of 35 patients had HACAs (and therefore undetectable infliximab levels as HACAs interfere with infliximab detection). In this group, among 12 who were switched to another anti-TNF agent, 11 (92%) experienced clinical responses; among 6 whose infliximab doses were increased, 1 (17%) experienced a clinical response.
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
Citation(s):
Afif W et al. Clinical utility of measuring infliximab and human anti-chimeric antibody concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 May; 105:1133.
Comment
These retrospective data point to the potential value of measuring infliximab and HACA concentrations in patients with IBD who experience partial response or loss of response to infliximab or who restart treatment after a drug holiday (among 7 patients assessed after a drug holiday, 6 [86%] had detectable HACAs). The authors suggest that, in patients with subtherapeutic infliximab concentrations, the quantity or frequency of the infliximab dose should be increased. If HACAs are detected, another anti-TNF agents should be considered. When therapeutic infliximab concentrations are detected, endoscopic or radiographic assessment should be conducted to determine whether active disease is present. If it is, the clinician should consider switching the patient to a treatment other than an anti-TNF agent; the absence of active disease suggests a non-IBD etiology. Overall, these findings suggest that a tailored, test-based approach for patients with IBD who experience diminishing or partial response to infliximab might be superior to the empirical approach currently used in clinical practice.