Comparing Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

AIMS65 better predicted mortality and Glasgow-Blatchford better predicted the need for transfusion, but both scoring systems can be helpful in identifying high-risk patients with UGIB.

Investigators recently derived and validated AIMS65 — a new scoring system to predict outcomes for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) — using a large population of patients from 187 U.S. hospitals (JW Gastroenterol Dec 9 2011).

Now, the researchers have revalidated AIMS65 using data on 278 UGIB patients from a tertiary-care hospital who had a higher severity of disease than that observed in the original population. They also compared the performance of AIMS65 with that of the Glasgow-Blatchford system (GBS; JW Gastroenterol Jul 29 2011) in predicting the primary outcome of inpatient mortality and several secondary outcomes: the composite endpoint of mortality, rebleeding, and endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical interv…

Reviewing Author

David J. Bjorkman, MD, MSPH (HSA), SM (Epid.)

Disclosures

Nothing to disclose

David J. Bjorkman, MD, MSPH (HSA), SM (Epid.)

Disclosures

Nothing to disclose