Loading...
Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is relatively new but already carries a Class I guideline recommendation for patients who have failed to respond to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Now, ablation is being investigated as a first-line therapy for AF (NEJM JW Cardiol Oct 24 2012). In the industry-supported, international RAAFT-2 trial, 127 patients were randomized to treatment with either AADs chosen at investigators' discretion (flecainide, 69%; propafenone, 25%) or AF ablation (radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation confirmed by entrance block). All patients had experienced ≤4 episodes of AF during the prior 6 months and had no previous history of AAD use or AF ablation. The primary endpoint was AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia of more than 30 seconds' duration during 2-year follow-up.
The rate of the primary endpoint was 54.6% in the ablation group and 72.1% in the AAD group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.35–0.90; P=0.02). No strokes or deaths occurred, but four patients in the ablation group experienced pericardial tamponade. Quality-of-life scores improved in both groups with no significant between-group difference.
Morillo CA et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): A randomized trial. JAMA 2014 Feb 19; 311:692. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.467)
Calkins H.Has the time come to recommend catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation as first-line therapy? JAMA 2014 Feb 19; 311:679. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.468)
Comment
In this trial, radiofrequency ablation was more effective than antiarrhythmic drugs as an initial treatment for atrial fibrillation. Yet the efficacy was modest (more than half of the participants experienced a recurrence) and came at a cost of increased risk for complications. As an editorialist notes, this study bolsters support for the current Class IIb recommendation of ablation as a first-line AF therapy; patient preference and particular clinical circumstances should continue to drive individual decision-making.