Loading...
Most hospitals use a single standard for an abnormal troponin level, but using sex-specific thresholds may be more appropriate. Researchers in Scotland evaluated consecutive patients with an acute coronary syndrome to determine the effect of applying sex-specific diagnostic thresholds to results of a high-sensitivity assay for cardiac troponin I compared with a single threshold based on a conventional troponin I test.
Of the 1126 patients (504 women and 622 men), 11% of the women and 19% of the men were classified as having a type 1 myocardial infarction (MI) based on the standard troponin I assay. Using the high-sensitivity assay and sex-specific thresholds, 22% of the women and 21% of the men were classified as having a type 1 myocardial infarction. At 12 months, outcomes of women identified solely with the high-sensitivity troponin I assay and sex-specific thresholds were similar to those who met criteria for type 1 MI with the conventional assay. For men with MI identified solely by the sex-specific threshold, risk was higher compared with both men without myocardial infarction and men with MI identified by the conventional assay.
Shah ASV et al. High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2015 Jan 21; 350:g7873. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7873)
Comment
The findings of this study are profound in suggesting that, by using a uniform threshold with conventional troponin testing, we are missing myocardial infarctions in women, which may contribute to sex disparities in outcomes. This study needs immediate replication so that we can know if it should be translated into practice.