A systematic review highlights a lack of quality data.
Many patients and caregivers worry about the potential for a decline in cognitive function after cardiovascular procedures. Researchers sought to illuminate the evidence by conducting a systematic review of cognitive outcomes among older adults (aged ≥65 years) after coronary or carotid revascularization, cardiac valve procedures, or ablation for atrial fibrillation.
The authors identified 17 randomized trials and 4 prospective cohort studies. The quality was uneven: 3 had a high risk of bias, 11 a moderate risk, and 7 had unclear bias risk. Mean participant age was 68 years; 80% were men.
Despite numerous analyses within each study, the authors found little to no difference in cognitive outcomes between treatment groups. The authors found no…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association