A randomized trial shows that the traditional practice of irrigation after incision and drainage of an abscess does not reduce need for additional intervention within 30 days.
Irrigation after incision and drainage is a traditional recommendation for the management of cutaneous abscesses, despite a lack of robust evidence supporting the practice. In a single-center, randomized, unblinded trial, researchers compared need for further intervention within 30 days between patients undergoing irrigation versus no irrigation during incision and drainage for cutaneous abscess in the emergency department.
Thirty-day follow-up was completed successfully in 187 patients (89%). The group randomized to irrigation was slightly younger than the group randomized to no irrigation (median age, 35 vs. 40 years) and received more-aggressive therapy (packing in 89% vs. 75%; outpatient antibiotics in 91% vs. 73%). Nevertheless, the nee…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPortola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Speaker’s BureauPeerView Institute for Medical Education
Grant/Research SupportAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CDC; NIH–National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIH–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); NIH–NIAID–Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group; Merck; Pfizer; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Shire; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis; bioMérieux; Siemens; Rapid Pathogen Screening; Magnolia; Stago; Innovative Biosensors; Molecular Detection, Inc.; Dyax Corp.; Trius Pharmaceuticals
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPortola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Speaker’s BureauPeerView Institute for Medical Education
Grant/Research SupportAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CDC; NIH–National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIH–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); NIH–NIAID–Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group; Merck; Pfizer; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Shire; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis; bioMérieux; Siemens; Rapid Pathogen Screening; Magnolia; Stago; Innovative Biosensors; Molecular Detection, Inc.; Dyax Corp.; Trius Pharmaceuticals