Loading...
This study describes physician noncompliance with an evidence-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool for pulmonary embolism (PE) in a moderate-sized tertiary academic center. The rate of overriding CDS evidence-based protocols for low-risk PE was evaluated, along with the subsequent rate of positive findings by computed tomography (CT) angiography.
Low-risk patients were defined by a Wells score of ≤4. For these patients, a d-dimer assay was recommended for risk stratification. The rate of positive CT findings in patients who did not have a d-dimer ordered or who had a normal d-dimer but went on to CT angiography anyway (the override group; 589 patients) was compared with the rate in those who had CT angiography based on CDS (i.e., Wells…