The systemic inflammatory response syndrome is more sensitive, whereas the quick sequential organ function assessment score is more specific for predicting organ dysfunction and mortality.
Clinicians commonly underestimate infection severity in patients with sepsis, resulting in delayed treatment and worsened outcomes. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) can be an indicator of infection severity, but is not perfectly sensitive and is highly nonspecific. The quick sequential organ function assessment (qSOFA) score has been proposed as a better initial method to assess infection severity. These authors compared performance of the two scores in 8871 patients admitted from the emergency department with presumed infection.
Generally, SIRS was more sensitive for predicting infection severity, but qSOFA was more specific, with similar overall utility. For predicting organ dysfunction, the area under the receiver operat…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresRoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; MINDSOURCE
Editorial BoardsThe Quarterly Update: Reviews of Current Child Abuse Medical Research; Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesThe Helfer Society (Executive Committee Member)
DisclosuresRoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; MINDSOURCE
Editorial BoardsThe Quarterly Update: Reviews of Current Child Abuse Medical Research; Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesThe Helfer Society (Executive Committee Member)