These results suggest it is as good as chloral hydrate, but not better.
Oral chloral hydrate is a good option for pediatric procedural sedation, especially for nonpainful, yet anxiety-provoking situations. These authors in Hong Kong and China tested whether intranasal dexmedetomidine might have similar effects with quicker recovery.
In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, 196 children (age range, 2–79 months) who were being sedated for computed tomography scan received either oral chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) plus intranasal saline or oral placebo plus intranasal dexmedetomidine (3 µg/kg) 30 minutes before the scan. Time to sedation, time to recovery, and the rate of successful sedation were similar in the two groups. More children in the chloral hydrate group resisted taking the oral medication (67% vs. 48%) a…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresRoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; MINDSOURCE
Editorial BoardsThe Quarterly Update: Reviews of Current Child Abuse Medical Research; Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesThe Helfer Society (Executive Committee Member)
DisclosuresRoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; MINDSOURCE
Editorial BoardsThe Quarterly Update: Reviews of Current Child Abuse Medical Research; Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesThe Helfer Society (Executive Committee Member)