Child abuse experts were more likely to skip testing when they met the family than when they reviewed summaries of cases.
Clinicians are disproportionately likely to test for abuse or report to child protective services in families that are poor or African American. This elegant study examined the influence of family social information (e.g., race, socioeconomic status, parental employment) and providers' intuition on testing decisions and diagnoses in cases of suspected child abuse.
Thirty-two experienced child abuse pediatricians submitted summaries from 730 consultations for suspected child abuse, including their testing recommendations and diagnoses. In each case, the pediatrician had examined the child and met the family. For each case, two of the pediatricians reviewed the summary and reported their recommendations for testing and diagnosis: one pediatric…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresRoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; MINDSOURCE
Editorial BoardsThe Quarterly Update: Reviews of Current Child Abuse Medical Research; Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesThe Helfer Society (Executive Committee Member)
DisclosuresRoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; MINDSOURCE
Editorial BoardsThe Quarterly Update: Reviews of Current Child Abuse Medical Research; Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesThe Helfer Society (Executive Committee Member)