Loading...
Two reports describe candidate Zika vaccines developed with traditional and innovative technologies.
Previously, a purified formalin-inactivated Zika vaccine (ZPIV) candidate derived from 2015 Puerto Rico virus was shown to protect mice and nonhuman primates against viremia after virus challenge. Investigators now report on phase 1, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of ZPIV. Healthy adults at three US sites received either the vaccine or saline intramuscularly on days 1 and 29. Among 52 evaluable ZPIV recipients 92% seroconverted by day 57, as indicated by microneutralization titers of at least 1:10. Purified antibody from vaccinated participants infused into mice gave partial or complete protection from viremia after virus challenge. More than half had injection site pain or tenderness; systemic adverse effects (fatigue, headache, and malaise) were common, and one recipient reported a postvaccination severe systemic event.
The other report describes two DNA-based vaccine candidates, one with envelope protein containing Zika virus (ZV) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) sequences and another with wild-type Zika sequences. Both had induced robust antibody responses in nonhuman primates. At three study sites the two vaccines were administered to healthy human adults using various schedules and two or three doses. Some 4 mg doses were split (2 mg in each deltoid) and some were given by needle-free injection. T-cell response was assessed using intracellular cytokine staining. Four weeks postvaccination positive antibody responses were seen in 60% to 89% of recipients of the first vaccine (JEV-ZV) and 77% to 100% of second vaccine recipients. All 14 recipients of the second vaccine by needle-free injection had positive antibody responses. Local and systemic symptoms were mild to moderate; no severe events were attributed to vaccination.
Modjarrad K et al. Preliminary aggregate safety and immunogenicity results from three trials of a purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine candidate: Phase 1, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Lancet 2017 Dec 4; [e-pub]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33106-9)
Gaudinski MR et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two Zika virus DNA vaccine candidates in healthy adults: Randomised, open-label, phase 1 clinical trials. Lancet 2017 Dec 4; [e-pub]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33105-7)
Marques ETA and Burke DS.Tradition and innovation in development of a Zika vaccine. Lancet 2017 Dec 4; [e-pub]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33107-0)
Comment
These small phase-1 trials confirm that at least two approaches have produced vaccines that are safe and immunogenic. A trial is currently under way in Puerto Rico to assess safety and immunogenicity in a population with high prevalence of flavivirus (dengue) immunity because of concern about possible antibody-dependent enhancement. Investigators in the second study note the advantage of DNA vaccine platform: It induces substantial T-cell responses in addition to antibody. The antibody response to DNA vaccines varied by vaccine delivery method. To date no DNA vaccines have been licensed. The second DNA vaccine, which seemed more immunogenic, has already been advanced to an international phase 2 efficacy trial. The editorialists comment that vaccines should exclude viral antigens that might trigger Guillain-Barré and point to the need for better understanding of the correlates of protection for fetal infection.