Modeling environmental and genetic factors is shown to improve CRC risk stratification and enable tailoring of screening recommendations.
Guidelines recommend that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening begin at age 50 in average-risk individuals and at earlier ages for all (or a subset, in some guidelines) of those with a family history of CRC or advanced adenomas. These recommendations are practical but suboptimal considering the wide range of actual risk within the enormous population they cover.
Toward the development of tailored risk assessment strategies, investigators developed CRC risk models using half of a patient database constructed from multiple study cohorts. The models incorporated family history, an “E” score based on 19 lifestyle and environmental factors (i.e., demographics, anthropometric measures, risk behaviors, diet, medical history, and medication use), and a “G” score based on 63 CRC-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms. The risk models were validated for predicting CRC risk in the other half of the patients in the database, and then used to calculate recommended ages to start screening (i.e., ages when risk reductions would be equal to those based on average-risk screening at 50 years).
Use of the E and G scores, particularly when combined, led to better risk stratification of when to start colonoscopy screening compared with use of family history alone. For example, men and women with a positive family history of CRC and a combined E–G score in the 90th percentile would start screening at ages 40 and 46, respectively, whereas men and women with an E–G score in the 10th percentile with a positive CRC family history would start at ages 51 and 59, respectively. Using the model, 15% of men and 62% of women with a positive family history would not begin screening until age 50.
In the “average-risk” group, men and women with an E–G score in the 90th percentile should start screening at 44 and 50, respectively, and in the 10th percentile, at 56 and 64 years.
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
Comment
Implementing this system on a widespread basis would be challenging, but the results of the model suggest that a personalized approach to initiation of colorectal cancer screening based on environmental and genetic factors could lead to more effective application of screening resources.