Survival was not improved with broad-based sequencing versus limited testing for EGFR or ALK alterations alone.
Genomic sequencing in the community oncology setting can be challenging. To determine the association between genomic sequencing and treatment or survival among patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a community setting, investigators retrospectively reviewed data in the Flatiron Health Database from 2011 to 2016 on 5688 patients (80% were smokers) from 191 community practices with unresectable nonsquamous NSCLC who received at least one line of systemic therapy.
Of these patients, 15.4% received multigene panel sequencing, and 84.6% received only EGFR or ALK testing. Broad-based genomic sequencing evaluated more than 30 genes and was performed prior to third-line therapy, whereas the EGFR and ALK testing was performed …
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardGenentech; AstraZeneca; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Clinical Care Options; Heron; Takeda; Ariad; MedIQ; Targeted Healthcare Communications; Novartis; OncLive; Roche; TRM Oncology
RoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportMedimmune; NIH/National Cancer Institute; Millennium; Genentech; Polaris Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; SWOG–Hope Foundation; American Cancer Society; Department of Defense; GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; Merck; Eli Lilly; Takeda; Bristol-Myers Squibb
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardGenentech; AstraZeneca; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Clinical Care Options; Heron; Takeda; Ariad; MedIQ; Targeted Healthcare Communications; Novartis; OncLive; Roche; TRM Oncology
RoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportMedimmune; NIH/National Cancer Institute; Millennium; Genentech; Polaris Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; SWOG–Hope Foundation; American Cancer Society; Department of Defense; GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; Merck; Eli Lilly; Takeda; Bristol-Myers Squibb