In a single survey, results on studies involving almost 90,000 people were never reported, potentially skewing the medical evidence base.
In medicine, we depend on the medical literature. However, what we cannot see — what is missing from the literature — might also be important. In the last decade, many studies have revealed that scientists conducting clinical trials too commonly do not provide the results publicly. Although some experts have suggested that trials with unreported data are mostly inconsequential, others have provided data that cast doubt on that belief.
To explore this issue further, Tatsioni and colleagues started with a search on ClinicalTrials.gov for long-unpublished, large, randomized trials that started after June 1, 2007, and were completed before June 1, 2012; the authors focused on the 500 trials with the largest number of participants. Trials for whi…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardUnited Healthcare; Element Science; Eyedentifeye, F-Prime
EquityHugo Health; Refactor Health; Element Science
Grant/Research SupportPfizer; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Janssen Research and Development, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Cancer Institute; American Heart Association