Loading...
In resource-limited settings, the prohibitive cost of viral-load testing makes virologic success of antiretroviral treatment difficult to assess directly. The WHO recommends monitoring CD4-cell counts instead, but waiting for these counts to drop can result in suboptimal management. Investigators wondered whether estimating patients’ adherence levels using pharmacy records might provide an earlier clue to virologic failure.
Medical records and pharmacy claims were reviewed for almost 2000 HIV-infected adults in southern Africa who initiated NNRTI-based antiretroviral therapy. At both 6 months and 12 months, about 25% of patients experienced virologic failure (confirmed by viral-load testing). Estimated adherence ≤90% (defined as missing ≥1 monthly drug pick-up every 6 months) predicted virologic failure better than did change in CD4-cell count, both at 6 months and at 12 months; receiver operating curves supported the superiority of adherence as a measure of virologic success. In a variety of other statistical analyses, adherence levels were at least as accurate as CD4-cell levels in predicting virologic failure, whether defined as viral load >1000 copies/mL or >10,000 copies/mL.
Bisson GP et al. Pharmacy refill adherence compared with CD4 count changes for monitoring HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy. PLoS Med 2008 May 20; 5:e109. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050109)
Comment
These authors make a reasonable argument for targeting viral-load assessments in resource-poor settings to patients who have poor records for refilling their prescriptions. Would this strategy work in the developed world? Possibly, but overall we have too much drug diversion in some urban settings like New York City and too much latent drug resistance in treatment-experienced patients who fail treatment despite impeccable adherence records. One suspects that it is only a matter of time before these same problems surface in some resource-poor settings, too.