The jury is still out on the question of whether the Awaji criteria improve accuracy for the diagnosis of ALS compared with the El Escorial criteria.
For the last 10 years, the revised El Escorial criteria have been the gold standard for the research diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). These criteria define ALS with four tiers of diagnostic confidence, depending on the extent of upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) findings. The Awaji criteria, published in 2008, were an effort to improve sensitivity for the diagnosis of ALS. In this algorithm, clinical and electromyographic evidence of LMN dysfunction are given equal weight, and fasciculations are considered equivalent to fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves as evidence of ongoing denervation. In a prospective study of 215 patients who were evaluated for suspected ALS (200 of whom were eventual…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresGrant / Research supportNIH NeuroBioBank; ALS Association; NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; FDA; Department of Defense
Editorial boardsCochrane Collaboration
Leadership positions in professional societiesMuscle Study Group Executive Committee
DisclosuresGrant / Research supportNIH NeuroBioBank; ALS Association; NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; FDA; Department of Defense
Editorial boardsCochrane Collaboration
Leadership positions in professional societiesMuscle Study Group Executive Committee