Loading...
During the past decade, researchers and the radiology community have expended much effort to develop noninvasive coronary imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In a systematic review and meta-analysis, researchers summarized the results of 89 CT and 20 MRI studies in which these tests were compared with conventional coronary angiography for detection of clinically significant coronary artery disease (CAD); patients with at least one stenosis of ≥50% were classified as having positive test results.
Mean sensitivity and specificity were greater for CT (97% and 87%, respectively) than for MRI (87% and 70%, respectively).