Loading...
Dysesthesia, an unpleasant sensation that is perceived on or under the skin, can occur spontaneously or in response to mild cutaneous stimuli. In four recent placebo-controlled clinical trials, dysesthesia was reported as a side effect of the GLP-1 agonist semaglutide.
The incidence of dysesthesia in these studies was as follows:
5% with 25 mg of oral semaglutide daily1
13% with 50 mg of oral semaglutide daily2
23% and 6% with injected semaglutide at weekly doses of 7.2 mg and 2.4 mg, respectively3 — and 19% and 5% in a separate study of the same two doses4
The first three studies involved patients with obesity but not diabetes; the fourth involved patients with both obesity and diabetes. The incidence of dysesthesia in placebo recipients was 0% or 1% in all studies. The 50-mg oral dose and the 7.2-mg injected dose are not FDA-approved.
1. Wharton S, et al. Oral semaglutide at a dose of 25 mg in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med 2025 Sep 18; 393:1077. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2500969. PubMed
2. Knop FK, et al. Oral semaglutide 50 mg taken once per day in adults with overweight or obesity (OASIS 1): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023 Aug 26; 402:705. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01185-6. PubMed
3. Wharton S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide 7·2 mg in adults with obesity (STEP UP): A randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2025 Nov; 13:949. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00226-8. PubMed
4. Lingvay I, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide 7·2 mg in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes (STEP UP T2D): A randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2025 Nov; 13:935. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00225-6. PubMed
Industry funded: Yes
Comment
In these semaglutide studies, the highest incidence of dysesthesia (≈20%) was seen in patients receiving high non-approved doses; for approved doses (25 mg orally and 2.4 mg subcutaneously), the incidence (5%) was low but not trivial. To my knowledge, a substantial incidence of dysesthesia hasn’t been described with other GLP-1 agonists, and it’s unclear why this side effect has only recently been documented in clinical trials. My sense (from informal discussions) is that most primary care clinicians are unaware of it, but that could be because it’s fairly uncommon with currently available doses and isn’t on our radar. In any case, the next question is whether it will now be recognized more frequently in real-world practice.