Loading...
By Joe Elia
Edited by David G. Fairchild, MD, MPH
Drug companies' protestations that their high prices stem from the costs of development don't hold up under scrutiny, a JAMA analysis asserts.
The analysts reviewed clinical, regulatory, and legislative documents from the past decade to investigate factors contributing to U.S. drug costs — the world's highest.
They assign blame to two major factors: protection from competition by manufacturers of generic versions and prohibitions against negotiating lower prices. Also at fault are government-granted monopoly rights for new drugs and legal (and chemical) maneuverings to extend those monopolies.
The authors find "little evidence of an association between [R&D] costs and drug prices." Here in the U.S., they say, pricing is based on "what the market will bear."
(In related news, the New York Times noted the six-fold increase over the past decade in the price of Mylan's EpiPen, the epinephrine self-injection device for life-threatening allergic reactions.)
Comment
LINK(S):
JAMA article (Free)
New York Times story (Free)
Background: Physician's First Watch coverage of cancer drug prices (Free)