Data from large, prospective cohort studies support the conclusion that colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
Recent case-control and colonoscopy studies have consistently identified reductions in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality following colonoscopy. Randomized, controlled trials have established a reduction in distal CRC incidence and mortality following sigmoidoscopy. To further examine this issue, researchers analyzed long-term, follow-up data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.
Results of 22 years of follow-up of 88,902 participants (1,738,396 person-years) are below:
CRC incidence: 1815
CRC deaths: 474
Reductions in incidence associated with polypectomy (43%), negative sigmoidoscopy (40%), and negative colonoscopy (56%)
A 27% reduction in proximal cancer incidence associated with negative colonoscopy (but not with sigmoidoscopy)
Reductions in CRC mortality after screening sigmoidoscopy (41%) and after screening colonoscopy (68%)
A 53% reduction in proximal CRC mortality after screening colonoscopy (but not after sigmoidoscopy)
Lasting reductions in CRC incidence after negative colonoscopy (≤3 years, 65%; 3.1 to 5 years, 60%; 5.1 to 10 years, 48%; 10.1 to 15 years, 74%)
Lasting reduction in CRC incidence from 5.1 to 15 years after negative colonoscopy for both proximal (40%) and distal CRC (65%)
Attenuated reduction in cancer incidence after polypectomy in patients with high-risk adenomas
Higher likelihood of CpG island methylator phenotype (odds ratio, 2.19) or microsatellite instability (OR, 2.10) in cancers occurring ≤5 years after colonoscopy
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
Comment
Although these results present nothing new, the large size and prestige of these surveys reinforces previous evidence. Colonoscopy does protect against colorectal cancer incidence and death, but the effect is less in the proximal colon than in the distal colon. The results also augment mounting evidence of sessile serrated polyps in the proximal colon being missed, ineffectively resected, or both. Additional education could improve identification and removal of these lesions.
The results in the polypectomy cohort are disappointing and suggest that endoscopists must do more to effectively identify high-risk patients. Also, perhaps more-aggressive follow-up intervals are needed in highest-risk polyp groups.