Results of two randomized, controlled trials confirm their lack of efficacy.
The efficacy of thiopurines — azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine — for induction of remission in Crohn disease has been controversial. Now, results of two randomized, controlled trials confirm their lack of efficacy in this setting.
In a double-blind trial, investigators randomized 131 adult patients newly diagnosed with Crohn disease to receive azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg per day) or placebo. Corticosteroids (but no other concomitant medications) were allowed for control of disease activity. After 76 weeks, rates of sustained corticosteroid-free remission were 44.1% in the azathioprine group and 36.5% in the placebo group (P=0.48). Relapse rates and corticosteroid requirements were similar between groups. In a post-hoc analysis, relapse defined as Crohn's Disease Activity Index score ≥220 was lower with azathioprine versus placebo (11.8% vs. 30.2%; P=0.01).
In an open-label study, investigators randomized 132 patients recently diagnosed with Crohn disease (within the previous 6 months) and at high risk for disabling disease to receive azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg per day) or conventional management (involving azathioprine only for select circumstances; e.g., poor response to corticosteroids). The primary end point was the percentage of trimesters in remission (without use of steroids or anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF] agents) and was similar between the azathioprine and conventional management groups (67% and 56%; P=0.69). Patients in the azathioprine group were less likely to require perianal surgery, but no difference in intestinal surgeries was observed.
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardOlympus Corporation America; Boston Scientific
Speaker’s BureauOlympus
Grant/Research SupportMedtronic; Boston Scientific; Colonary Solutions; Paion Medical; Medivators; Braintree Laboratories
Editorial BoardsWorld Journal of Gastroenterology; The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology; Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; Medscape Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Annals of Gastroenterology & Hepatology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research; Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology; Gastroenterology Research and Practice; GI & Hepatology News; Gastroenterology Report; Clinical Epidemiology Reviews; JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology; GI Journal Watch; Austin Journal of Gastroenterology; World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Treasurer); US Multi-Society Task Force (AGA, ACG, ASGE) (Chair)
Comment
Available evidence now indicates that thiopurines are not effective and should not be used to induce remission in recent-onset Crohn disease. However, thiopurines may still have other roles, such as preventing recurrence after surgery (although initial evidence indicates that anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are superior for this indication). Lastly, in recent trials, the combination of infliximab and thiopurines was superior to thiopurine use alone (NEJM JW Gastroenterol Apr 14 2010). Therefore, thiopurines may be appropriate for induction of remission in Crohn disease when used in combination with anti-TNF agents, particularly infliximab, and can also reduce the formation of infliximab antibodies.