Loading...
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends against routine genetic counseling or BRCA testing in women whose family histories are not associated with excess risk for BRCA mutations. Dr. Mary-Claire King, Lasker-Koshland Award–winning discoverer of the BRCA1 mutation, makes the case for universal screening of women in their 30s, positing that population-based screening would lower mortality from ovarian and breast cancer. One concern regarding universal screening is that, unlike mutation carriers with foreboding family or personal cancer histories, the clinical implications of mutation carrier status without such histories are uncertain.
In a JAMA Viewpoint, Dr. King and coauthors discuss their recent study in which healthy Ashkenazi Jewish men were screened (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Sep 8 2014 [e-pub ahead of print]). Female relatives of male mutation carriers who were also identified as being BRCA1 mutation carriers had a 60% and 83% risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer by age 60 and 80, respectively. Based on other data, the authors point out that 50% of families with BRCA1 or 2 mutations have no ominous histories of breast or ovarian cancer, and that female mutation carriers within such families have cancer risks similar to those seen in carriers from families with numerous affected relatives.
King M-C et al. Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award. JAMA 2014 Sep 8; [e-pub ahead of print]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.12483)
Comment
Many women are identified as BRCA mutation carriers only after they have been diagnosed with cancer, underscoring the advantages of universal screening. Although I agree that such screening can prevent deaths from BRCA-related malignancies, major challenges exist. Screening costs in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals are relatively low because a limited number of mutations account for most relevant mutations in this population; costs are substantially higher in diverse populations. Also, screening currently identifies many genetic variations of unknown significance, perplexing clinicians and patients alike. Finally, the limited availability of trained genetics counselors in the U.S. validates concerns that women who harbor deleterious mutations may choose life-altering interventions without adequate guidance.