Loading...
A prior phase III study showed that second-line treatment with crizotinib — a small-molecule inhibitor of ALK, MET, and ROS1 kinase — was more effective than chemotherapy in patients with ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; N Engl J Med 2013; 368:2385).
To test whether crizotinib is also more effective than standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for this population, investigators conducted an industry-funded, international, randomized, open-label, phase III study (PROFILE 1014) involving 343 treatment-naive patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received six cycles of oral crizotinib or intravenous platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. Chemotherapy patients who experienced disease progression could cross over to crizotinib therapy.
Patients who received crizotinib versus chemotherapy achieved improved overall response rate (74% vs. 45%; P<0.001) and improved median progression-free survival (PFS, the primary endpoint; 10.9 vs. 7.0 months; P<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group; however, the 1-year OS rate was 84% with crizotinib and 79% with chemotherapy. Crizotinib also improved quality of life and reduced lung cancer–related symptoms. The main toxicities with crizotinib were visual disturbances, diarrhea, nausea, and edema; the main toxicities with chemotherapy were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, and anorexia. Grade 3 and 4 elevation of liver-function tests in the crizotinib arm were managed with dose reductions or interruptions. Two patients discontinued crizotinib because of interstitial lung disease.
Solomon BJ et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2014 Dec 4; 371:2167. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408440)
Comment
Crizotinib provides superior quality of life, response rates, and PFS over frontline chemotherapy in ALK-positive NSCLC. One limitation of the trial is that the chemotherapy arm did not include maintenance pemetrexed, which is now standard of care. Also, the OS may be difficult to determine because patients in the chemotherapy arm were allowed to cross over to crizotinib after disease progression. These criticisms do not change the conclusion of the trial that crizotinib or another ALK inhibitor should be considered in the frontline treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.