A lack of PET response to anti-HER2 therapy at 1 week had a 91% negative predictive value.
Genomic assays, circulating tumor cells, and dynamic imaging have all been proposed as ways of predicting which patients with metastatic disease will benefit from a particular therapy. In some cases, these tools have been proposed as ways to get an early indication of benefit, potentially identifying patients who may require a change of therapy before undergoing scans at the traditional 3-month intervals. However, these strategies have not offered any clear advantage.
Now, investigators have conducted a nonrandomized phase II study to test the potential of using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) imaging 1 week after starting therapy to predict response to anti–human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. …
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardLilly; AstraZeneca; Gilead
Grant/Research SupportBreast Cancer Research Foundation
Editorial BoardsClinical Breast Cancer; Oncology; Annals of Surgery; Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (Chair, Breast Cancer Panel); American Board of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology Board)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardLilly; AstraZeneca; Gilead
Grant/Research SupportBreast Cancer Research Foundation
Editorial BoardsClinical Breast Cancer; Oncology; Annals of Surgery; Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (Chair, Breast Cancer Panel); American Board of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology Board)