Chemoradiation significantly improved survival versus chemotherapy alone.
Elderly patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are a challenge to treat due to comorbidities and the required aggressive treatment regimens for curative intent.
To determine whether they derive benefit from aggressive therapy, investigators evaluated 8637 stage I–III SCLC patients (median age, 75; year of diagnosis, 2003–2011) in the National Cancer Data Base and evaluated survival outcomes for those treated with chemoradiation (median dose, 59.4 Gy) versus chemotherapy alone. Factors significantly associated with receiving palliative chemotherapy instead of curative-intent chemoradiation were increasing age, clinical stage III disease, female gender, and presence of medical comorbidities.
Results were as follows:
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardGenentech; AstraZeneca; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Clinical Care Options; Heron; Takeda; Ariad; MedIQ; Targeted Healthcare Communications; Novartis; OncLive; Roche; TRM Oncology
RoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportMedimmune; NIH/National Cancer Institute; Millennium; Genentech; Polaris Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; SWOG–Hope Foundation; American Cancer Society; Department of Defense; GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; Merck; Eli Lilly; Takeda; Bristol-Myers Squibb
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardGenentech; AstraZeneca; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Clinical Care Options; Heron; Takeda; Ariad; MedIQ; Targeted Healthcare Communications; Novartis; OncLive; Roche; TRM Oncology
RoyaltiesUpToDate
Grant/Research SupportMedimmune; NIH/National Cancer Institute; Millennium; Genentech; Polaris Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; SWOG–Hope Foundation; American Cancer Society; Department of Defense; GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals; Merck; Eli Lilly; Takeda; Bristol-Myers Squibb