Loading...
Up to half of patients with ALK-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will develop brain metastases within 2 years of diagnosis. To evaluate the use of crizotinib in this setting, investigators conducted an industry-supported, single-arm, phase III trial (PROFILE 1014), in which 343 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients received frontline treatment with oral crizotinib or intravenous platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. Patients with stable treated brain metastases were eligible. Intracranial efficacy was assessed with brain imaging every 6 weeks in the 23% of patients with stable treated brain metastases at baseline or every 12 weeks in those without known brain metastases.
Results were as follows:
A trend toward improvement in intracranial time to progression was seen with crizotinib versus chemotherapy in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (hazard ratio, 0.60; P=0.069), in those with treated brain metastases at baseline (HR, 0.45; P=0.063).
Patients with treated brain metastases at baseline had improved intracranial disease control with crizotinib versus chemotherapy at 12 weeks (85% vs. 45%; P<0.001) and at 24 weeks (56% vs. 25%; P=0.006).
Rates of intracranial disease progression were 27% in patients with treated brain metastases at baseline and 11% in those without treated brain metastases at baseline.
Extracranial disease was more common than intracranial disease, and it occurred more often in patients receiving chemotherapy than in those receiving crizotinib.
Disease progression solely in the brain was more common with crizotinib than with chemotherapy in the ITT population (24% vs. 10%), in those with treated brain metastases at baseline (38% vs. 23%), and in those without brain metastases at baseline (19% vs. 6%).
Solomon BJ et al. Intracranial efficacy of crizotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer: Results from PROFILE 1014. J Clin Oncol 2016 Mar 28; [e-pub]. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5888)
Comment
This study supports the use of crizotinib over chemotherapy as a frontline agent in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. However, crizotinib is not known to have substantial penetrance into the central nervous system. Therefore, the treatment paradigm may shift again following frontline trials of other ALK-targeted therapies with better blood–brain barrier penetrance, such as ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib. These newer-generation agents are already shifting the clinical paradigm in the salvage setting by potentially deferring brain radiation, thus sparing patients cognitive compromise. It remains to be seen whether frontline use of the newer-generation ALK inhibitors will be superior to crizotinib in preventing or delaying the occurrence of brain metastases.