Limiting the assessment of pain relief with ketorolac to 30–120 minutes after administration limits the conclusions we can draw from this study.
To determine the optimal dose of ketorolac, investigators at a single U.S. emergency department conducted a randomized double-blind trial in 240 patients with moderate-to-severe pain at various body sites. Patients received 10, 15, or 30 mg intravenous ketorolac. The primary outcome was pain reduction at 30 minutes, and outcomes were assessed for up to 120 minutes.
Baseline pain scores on a 10-point numeric rating scale were similar among the three groups. The mean improvements in pain ratings at 30 minutes were 2.5, 2.4, and 3.0 in the 10-, 15-, and 30-mg groups, respectively, but the between-group differences were not statistically significant, implying equivalence of the three doses. Differences in pain ratings remained similar at all tim…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPortola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Speaker’s BureauPeerView Institute for Medical Education
Grant/Research SupportAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CDC; NIH–National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIH–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); NIH–NIAID–Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group; Merck; Pfizer; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Shire; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis; bioMérieux; Siemens; Rapid Pathogen Screening; Magnolia; Stago; Innovative Biosensors; Molecular Detection, Inc.; Dyax Corp.; Trius Pharmaceuticals
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPortola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Speaker’s BureauPeerView Institute for Medical Education
Grant/Research SupportAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CDC; NIH–National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIH–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); NIH–NIAID–Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group; Merck; Pfizer; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Shire; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis; bioMérieux; Siemens; Rapid Pathogen Screening; Magnolia; Stago; Innovative Biosensors; Molecular Detection, Inc.; Dyax Corp.; Trius Pharmaceuticals