First-attempt intubation success was more common with more-upright patient positioning.
Prior research has suggested that patients should be intubated emergently in an upright, head-forward position rather than in the traditional supine position (NEJM JW Emerg Med Mar 15 2016; [e-pub] and Anesth Analg 2016; 122:1101).
To examine this issue further, investigators analyzed 231 intubations performed in two emergency departments (EDs) by 58 residents affiliated with a single residency program. Patient positioning was chosen at convenience, the angle of elevation of the bed was measured, and first-attempt intubation success rates were recorded.
First-attempt success was attained in 66% of supine intubations, 78% of inclined intubations, and 86% of upright intubations (angle of bed, ≥45 degrees).
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPortola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Speaker’s BureauPeerView Institute for Medical Education
Grant/Research SupportAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CDC; NIH–National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIH–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); NIH–NIAID–Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group; Merck; Pfizer; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Shire; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis; bioMérieux; Siemens; Rapid Pathogen Screening; Magnolia; Stago; Innovative Biosensors; Molecular Detection, Inc.; Dyax Corp.; Trius Pharmaceuticals
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPortola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Speaker’s BureauPeerView Institute for Medical Education
Grant/Research SupportAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; CDC; NIH–National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; NIH–National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); NIH–NIAID–Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group; Merck; Pfizer; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Shire; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Novartis; bioMérieux; Siemens; Rapid Pathogen Screening; Magnolia; Stago; Innovative Biosensors; Molecular Detection, Inc.; Dyax Corp.; Trius Pharmaceuticals