Natalizumab and alemtuzumab are highly effective at reducing relapses in MS.
Head-to-head data exist for alemtuzumab versus thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta 1a (IFN) and for fingolimod versus weekly intramuscular IFN. However, no trial data are available comparing alemtuzumab with natalizumab and with fingolimod. Researchers have now compared these treatments' effects on relapse rates and other outcomes using MSBase, a longitudinal international registry that prospectively collects observational data from multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical practices. Treatments are based on physician and patient preferences, along with payer approval. The researchers used propensity scores to match patients between treatment groups based on baseline characteristics.
Of 15,783 eligible patients, detailed propensity matching re…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardAlexion Pharmaceuticals; Amgen; Astoria; Biogen; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celltrion; Genentech; Hoffmann-La Roche; Genzyme; EMD Serono; Immpact-Bio; Immunic Therapeutics; Kyverna; Lundbeck; Novartis; Sandoz; TG Therapeutics
Grant/Research SupportNational Institutes of Health; National Multiple Sclerosis Society; U.S. Department of Defense
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesConsortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (Treasurer)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardAlexion Pharmaceuticals; Amgen; Astoria; Biogen; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celltrion; Genentech; Hoffmann-La Roche; Genzyme; EMD Serono; Immpact-Bio; Immunic Therapeutics; Kyverna; Lundbeck; Novartis; Sandoz; TG Therapeutics
Grant/Research SupportNational Institutes of Health; National Multiple Sclerosis Society; U.S. Department of Defense
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesConsortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (Treasurer)