Loading...
Orthopedists vary in their choice of antithrombotic therapy to prevent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after hip or knee replacement. In this retrospective study, researchers used data from a Michigan orthopedic registry to compare prophylaxis with aspirin and anticoagulants in nearly 42,000 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty at 29 hospitals between 2013 and 2015.
Proportions of patients who received prophylaxis with aspirin only, anticoagulants only (e.g., warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin, direct-acting oral anticoagulants), both, or neither, were 31%, 54%, 13%, and 2%, respectively. The primary outcome — DVT, pulmonary embolism, or death at 90 days — occurred with similar frequency in the groups that received prophylaxis (aspirin, 1.2%; anticoagulation, 1.4%; both, 1.3%) but was higher in the no-prophylaxis group (4.8%). After extensive adjustment for potentially confounding variables, no significant difference in the primary outcome was noted between the aspirin and anticoagulation groups, but the no-prophylaxis group had fivefold higher risk. Rates of serious bleeding were about 1% in all groups.
Hood BR et al. Association of aspirin with prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients after total knee arthroplasty compared with other anticoagulants: A noninferiority analysis. JAMA Surg 2018 Oct 17; [e-pub]. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3858)
Comment
These findings suggest that the effectiveness of aspirin prophylaxis is comparable to that of anticoagulation after total knee arthroplasty. During the 3 years of this study, use of aspirin-only prophylaxis in this cohort rose from 10% to 50% of cases, a trend that reflects its ease of use and low cost. A three-arm randomized study in which aspirin, warfarin, and rivaroxaban are being compared is in progress (PEPPER study).