Loading...
Although the rise in firearms-related deaths is a clear public health epidemic, many health professionals feel uncomfortable discussing firearms with patients. These researchers reviewed data from a 2018 California survey on violence prevention that included questions regarding the appropriateness of firearm safety conversations between patients and health professionals. The survey was distributed to a random sample of 5232 California residents aged 18 and older; 49% completed the survey.
Of respondents, 14% were firearm owners and 11% lived with firearm owners. Overall, 67% replied that firearms safety conversations are “at least sometimes” appropriate (vs. “never” or “don't know”). This response was more frequent among nonowners (70%) than owners (52%). However, when specific risk factors for firearm injury (suicidal thoughts, drug or alcohol abuse, and dementia or living with someone who has dementia) were included in the question, more than 80% of both owners and nonowners agreed that these conversations are at least sometimes appropriate. Similarly, more than 80% of both groups agreed that healthcare professionals should intervene (by counseling the patient or informing the family, a mental health professional, or the police) after learning that a patient with a firearm has thoughts of hurting him- or herself or others.
Pallin R et al. California public opinion on health professionals talking with patients about firearms. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019 Oct; 38:1744. (https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00602)
Comment
As a physician, veteran, and firearm owner, I'm always shocked at how infrequently my own healthcare professionals ask me about firearms. This study supports my belief that, especially for high-risk patients and their families, we should feel comfortable bringing up firearm safety and storage. Even more importantly, we should ask patients with access to firearms if they are thinking of hurting themselves or others and, if they are, we should absolutely intervene.