Propensity scores do not eliminate the need for randomized, blinded, controlled studies.
Propensity score adjustment has been used increasingly often in nonrandomized registries and real-world studies. These authors compared the placebo arm (A) from the AFFIRM phase 3 pivotal trial of natalizumab to the placebo arms (B) from the DEFINE and CONFIRM pivotal trials of dimethyl fumarate for treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Propensity score adjustments were successful in reducing baseline differences between the trials. Unadjusted analyses suggested superiority of placebo B for 6-month confirmed disability progression (0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47–0.88). After propensity score adjustments, placebo B continued to show consistent superiority over A. The authors acknowledge limitations of applying propensity score adjustments to …
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardAlexion Pharmaceuticals; Amgen; Astoria; Biogen; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celltrion; Genentech; Hoffmann-La Roche; Genzyme; EMD Serono; Immpact-Bio; Immunic Therapeutics; Kyverna; Lundbeck; Novartis; Sandoz; TG Therapeutics
Grant/Research SupportNational Institutes of Health; National Multiple Sclerosis Society; U.S. Department of Defense
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesConsortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (Treasurer)
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardAlexion Pharmaceuticals; Amgen; Astoria; Biogen; Bristol Myers Squibb; Celltrion; Genentech; Hoffmann-La Roche; Genzyme; EMD Serono; Immpact-Bio; Immunic Therapeutics; Kyverna; Lundbeck; Novartis; Sandoz; TG Therapeutics
Grant/Research SupportNational Institutes of Health; National Multiple Sclerosis Society; U.S. Department of Defense
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesConsortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (Treasurer)