Loading...
In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the mortality benefit of pharmacological rate control has been considered roughly equivalent to that of more-aggressive treatments such as rhythm control or ablate-and-pace (i.e., atrioventricular [AV] junction ablation with placement of a cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT] device), although rhythm control is showing better results than rate control in the latest randomized, controlled trials. Ablate-and-pace is an AF treatment strategy largely utilized in highly symptomatic individuals. In the APAF-CRT trial (NCT02137187), researchers found that this strategy decreased heart failure hospitalizations compared with pharmacological rate control in patients with severely symptomatic permanent AF …