Due to an error in the original article being reviewed, a pair of secondary results were stated incorrectly in our summary Should We Perform Valve Replacement for Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis?.
The paragraph summarizing the results has now been corrected to read as follows (correction in italics):
At median follow-up of 32 months, early SAVR was associated with a 54% relative reduction in the primary endpoint (36-month event rates, 15.2% for early SAVR vs. 34.7% for conservative management; P=0.02) — driven mostly by nonsignificant reductions in heart failure hospitalization (4.0% vs. 12.9%) and deaths (9.5% vs. 20.1%). Of note, 25 patients (32%) of the conservative group had undergone clinically indicated SAVR by the end of follow-up.…