Loading...
Daily, prolonged prone positioning (12–18 hours) improves outcomes in critically ill adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome that requires mechanical ventilation. However, data on prone positioning in nonintubated hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is limited and conflicting. Researchers conducted a pragmatic, unblinded, randomized trial in 15 hospitals in the U.S. and Canada that involved 257 patients with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen (≤50% fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2]]). Patients were assigned to prone positioning (four 2-hour sessions daily, in addition to prone sleeping) or standard care (typical positioning).
Median daily times spent prone in the first 72 hours were ≈2.5 hours in the prone group and 0 hours in the typical-positioning group. No difference in the composite primary outcome — death, invasive mechanical ventilation, or worsening respiratory failure requiring ≥60% FiO2 — was noted between the prone and standard groups (18% in each group).
Fralick M et al. Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxaemia due to covid-19: Multicentre pragmatic randomised trial (COVID-PRONE). BMJ 2022 Mar 23; 376:e068585. (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068585)
Comment
This study reinforces prior research showing that adherence to prone positioning in awake COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia is very poor (e.g., Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18:1424). Observational data also suggest that awake patients who derive the best outcomes have more-severe hypoxia than this cohort and remain prone longer — typically twice the duration observed here (Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9:1387). This study's lack of significant benefit notwithstanding, one can reasonably recommend that nonintubated patients with COVID-19–related hypoxemia spend as much time in the prone position as is safe and comfortable; further studies on strategies to maintain awake prone positioning are needed.