Loading...
We do not know the “right” oxygenation target for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Injury from hyperoxia can occur when partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) levels are too high, but delivery of oxygen to tissues can be inadequate with lower PaO2 targets. During the COVID-19 pandemic, limited resources (e.g., mechanical ventilators) heightened the debate about oxygenation targets.
European investigators randomized 726 patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia (i.e., patients receiving supplemental oxygen at 10 L/minute flow or mechanical ventilation) to a PaO2 oxygenation target of either 60 mm Hg or 90 mm Hg. Titration of oxygen, intubation, and weaning from mechanical support were at clinicians' discretion. About one quarter of patients were intubated at enrollment; this number nearly doubled during the trial. Both PaO2 and peripheral oxygenation saturation (SpO2) had good separation between groups at 30 days.
At 90 days, mortality did not differ between groups, although the number of days alive without life support was higher in the lower-oxygenation target group. This difference was driven primarily by lower use of mechanical ventilation.
Nielsen FM et al. Lower vs higher oxygenation target and days alive without life support in COVID-19: The HOT-COVID randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2024 Mar 19; [e-pub]. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.2934)
Comment
Many decisions about mechanical ventilation are made based on oxygenation levels. In the absence of predefined protocols, these data suggest that thresholds to intubate and extubate were likely affected by the different oxygenation targets. Either avoiding mechanical ventilation or liberating patients more quickly from mechanical ventilation is meaningful, regardless of mortality data. With that in mind, it makes sense to titrate SpO2 to the low 90s (closer to PaO2 of 60 mm Hg) as opposed to 100%.