A meta-analysis finds a potential signal favoring anticoagulation for patent foramen ovale and mixed results for left atrial enlargement.
Multiple large, randomized trials comparing anticoagulation with antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrent stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) have had neutral findings. However, subpopulations of ESUS patients with varied mechanisms of stroke could have differential responses to these antithrombotic options. To shed light on this question, investigators conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature and identified 7 randomized controlled trials of ESUS patients with a total of 14,804 participants randomized to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, including studies limited to ESUS patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial cardiopathy.
In keeping with previous trials, the pooled rates of r…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresGrant/Research SupportNIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
DisclosuresGrant/Research SupportNIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences