Loading...
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists are approved for various chronic inflammatory conditions affecting the skin, joints, and gastrointestinal tract. Concerns about risks for infection and malignancy are noted in the package inserts for all approved anti–TNF-α agents. Study results though have been mixed, with more forceful results from new studies in the rheumatology literature.
Previous studies and meta-analyses produced varying findings on the increased risk for nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) with TNF antagonists. Chakravarty and colleagues1 examined the risk for NMSC in 15,784 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and found a nonsignificant trend toward greater risk with use of TNF inhibitors alone, but a significantly increased risk when these drugs were combined with methotrexate. Wolfe and Michaud,2 using an extension of the same database, observed a statistically significant increase in risk for NMSC (relative risk, 1.5; P<0.001) associated with the use of TNF antagonists. Lebwohl and colleagues3 used data from clinical trials and postmarketing studies of etanercept use in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Determination of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was confirmed histologically in the trial participants but was not definitively confirmed in the postmarketing study patients. When the researchers compared their findings with population-based rates in Minnesota and Arizona, they found no increase in SCC risk in etanercept recipients.
Two newer studies have now examined risk for NMSC in patients receiving TNF antagonists for rheumatologic inflammatory disease. Mariette and colleagues4 performed a meta-analysis of studies reported in the literature or presented at rheumatology meetings. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to 2039 full-text papers and 1979 conference abstracts, the researchers included 21 papers and 8 abstracts for analysis. Although neither all-site cancers nor hematologic cancers (including lymphoma) were increased in TNF-inhibitor recipients, the researchers did find a statistically significant 45% increase in NMSC (odds ratio, 1.45), and the findings suggested that melanoma risk was also increased. These authors noted that most cutaneous cancers were found in the first year of therapy and that the risk did not increase over time.
Amari and colleagues5 performed a retrospective cohort study of 20,648 rheumatoid arthritis patients seen and treated within the Veterans Affairs hospital system and included in the national VA database. The risk for NMSC was roughly 1.5 times greater in TNF-α antagonist recipients compared with recipients of other disease-modifying agents (DMARDs). In addition, patients treated with nonbiologic DMARDs had significantly longer NMSC-free survival than patients receiving TNF-α antagonists. However, the researchers also found no association between the duration of TNF-α antagonist exposure and increased NMSC risk. Lastly, they compared the rates of NMSC associated with use of anti-TNF therapy and methotrexate and observed a significant association between TNF therapy and higher NMSC rates. In a comparison among the three most commonly used TNF agents (etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab), NMSC rates were significantly higher with adalimumab than with etanercept.
Chakravarty EF et al. Skin cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. J Rheumatol 2005 Nov; 32:2130.
Wolfe F and Michaud K. Biologic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of malignancy: Analyses from a large US observational study. Arthritis Rheum 2007 Sep; 56:2886.
Lebwohl M et al. No evidence for increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving etanercept for up to 5 years. Arch Dermatol 2005 Jul; 141:861.
Mariette X et al. Malignancies associated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in registries and prospective observational studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011 Nov; 70:1895.
Amari W et al. Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in a national cohort of veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011 Aug; 50:1431.
Comment
The data in these studies are compelling. Amari and colleagues conclude that their results “should prompt rheumatologists to carefully and systematically screen all patients on TNF-α antagonists periodically for skin cancer and pre-cancerous lesions.” Although I believe this to be valid, I don't know that rheumatologists have the necessary training to recognize these lesions. Therefore I suggest that dermatologists who regularly interact with rheumatologists have a practice gap to fill. The observation that duration of TNF-antagonist therapy was not associated with greater risk for skin cancer is perturbing. In other clinical scenarios (e.g., solid organ transplant patients on immunosuppressive therapies and psoriasis patients who undergo psoralen–ultraviolet A exposure and subsequently receive cyclosporin), we have noted a correlation between longer, deeper immune suppression and greater skin cancer risk.
Where do we go from here? First, dermatologists should determine whether findings in the rheumatology patients are generalizable to psoriasis patients and so should evaluate psoriasis patients treated with TNF antagonists for incidence of NMSC and melanoma, severity of disease, and therapeutic difficulty. Second, we need to know whether different TNF agents confer different risks. Third, we need to develop educational programs to help our colleagues in rheumatology and gastroenterology, and others who prescribe TNF antagonists to recognize precursor lesions and all types of skin cancers.