An evidence-based model suggests that hysterectomy is still worth considering as a first-line approach.
Heavy menstrual bleeding can adversely affect health and quality of life. In a randomized controlled trial, initial treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) was more cost-effective than immediate hysterectomy, even though 40% of women in the LNG-IUS arm eventually underwent hysterectomies (JW Womens Health Jun 9 2004). Now, investigators have developed a Markov model to assess relative costs and effectiveness of initial treatment with the LNG-IUS, hysterectomy, or endometrial ablation.
Analysis based on the model showed that hysterectomy is the most cost-effective initial approach, when the assumption is made that all women who experience treatment failure after first-line use of t…
Reviewing Author
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPlanned Parenthood Federation of America
Grant/Research SupportSociety of Family Planning; California Department of Public Health Tobacco Control Program
Editorial BoardsContraception; Journal of General Internal Medicine
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesCouncil Member, Society of General Internal Medicine
DisclosuresConsultant/Advisory BoardPlanned Parenthood Federation of America
Grant/Research SupportSociety of Family Planning; California Department of Public Health Tobacco Control Program
Editorial BoardsContraception; Journal of General Internal Medicine
Leadership Positions in Professional SocietiesCouncil Member, Society of General Internal Medicine